Estrategias de extracción de néctar por pinchaflores (Aves: Diglossa y Diglossopis) y sus efectos sobre la polinización de plantas de los altos Andes

Strategies of nectar extraction by Flowerpiercers (Aves: Diglossa and Diglossopis) and their effects on the pollination of high Andean plants

Authors

  • Sandra V. Rojas-Nossa Departamento de Biología, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59517/oc.e138

Keywords:

Diglossa, Diglossopis, flowerpiercers, high, Andean forest, nectar robbing, pollination

Abstract

The flowerpiercers (Aves: Diglossa and Diglossopis) have been considered parasites of hummingbird-flower interactions because they are highly specialized nectar robbers. Nevertheless, there are documented cases where these birds realize legitimate visits to extract nectar and apparently function as pollinators of some plants. I studied some ecological aspects of these two strategies of nectar extraction by four species of flowerpiercers in the Colombian Eastern Andes. I analyzed different morphological characteristics of birds and flowers relevant to their interaction, quantified the frequency of use of both strategies by identifying the marks left by the bills on the corollas and analyzed pollen loads from the bodies of flowerpiercers. The morphology of the maxillary hook, the position of the flower and the length of the corolla were the most important characteristics determining the strategy of extraction used by the birds. The species with the shortest bill and the most strongly curved hook (Diglossa albilatera) preferred to rob the nectar while a species with long bill and less pronounced hook (Diglossopis cyanea) used both strategies in equal proportions. Tubular and erect flowers with long corollas and a high caloric production were robbed with high intensity. The flowerpiercers transported pollen from plants with pendant flowers and medium to short corollas that they visited legitimately. They could be important pollinators of native and introduced plants in high Andean ecosystems as Macleania rupestris, Brachyotum strigosum, Axinaea macrophylla, Eucalyptus globulus, Gaiadendron punctatum and Clusia multiflora.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AMAYA, M. 1991. Análisis palinológico de la flora del parque Amacayacu (Amazonas) visitada por colibríes (Aves: Trochilidae). Tesis de pregrado Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá. Departamento de Biología.

ARIZMENDI, M. C. 2001. Multiple ecological interactions: nectar robbers and hummingbirds in a highland forest in Mexico. Canadian Journal of Zoology 79:997-1006.

ARIZMENDI, M. C., C. A. DOMÍNGUEZ & R. DIRZO. 1996.The role of an avian nectar robber and of hummingbird pollinators in the reproduction of two plant species. Functional Ecology 10: 119-127.

BARROWS, E. M. 1976. Nectar robbing and pollination of Lantana camara (Verbenaceae). Biotropica 8:132-135.

BEGON, M., J. L. HARPER & C. TOWNSEND 1986. Ecology: Individuals, populations and communities. Sinauer Associates Inc., Publishers. Sunderland, USA.

BOCK, W. 1985. Is Diglossa (?Thraupinae) monophyletic? Neotropical Ornithology. Ornithological Monographs 36: 319-332.

BOLTEN, A. B., P. FEINSINGER, H. G. BAKER & I. BAKER. 1979. On the calculation of sugar concentration in flower nectar. Oecologia (Berl.) 41: 301-304.

BOUCHER, D. H., S. JAMES & K. KEELER. 1982. The ecology of mutualism. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 13: 315-347.

BRONSTEIN, J. L. 1994. Our current understanding of mutualism. Quarterly Review of Biology 69: 31-51.

COLWELL, R. K., B. J. BETTS, P. BUNNELL, F. L. CARPENTER & P. FEINSINGER. 1974. Competition for the nectar of Centropogon valerii by the hummingbird Colibri thalassinus and the flower-piercer Diglossa plumbea, and its evolutionary implications. Condor 76: 447-454.

FAEGRI, K. & L. VAN DER PIJL. 1979. Principles of pollination ecology. 3a Ed. Pergamon Press, Nueva York.

GARCÍA-FRANCO, J. G., D. MARTÍNEZ. & T. M. PÉREZ. 2001. Hummingbird flower mites and Tillandsia spp. (Bromeliaceae): polyphagy in a cloud forest of Veracruz, Mexico. Biotropica 33: 538-542.

GASS, C. L., M. ROMICH & R. K. SUAREZ. 1999. Energetics of hummingbird foraging at low ambient temperature. Canadian Journal of Zoology 77: 1-7.

GRAVES, G. 1982. Pollinaton of a Tristerix mistletoe (Loranthaceae) by Diglossa (Aves, Thraupidae). Biotropica 14: 316-317.

GUTIÉRREZ, A. 2005. Ecología de la interacción entre colibríes (Aves: Trochilidae) y las plantas que polinizan en el boque altoandino de Torca. Tesis de Maestría en Biología. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá.

GUTIÉRREZ, A. & S. V. ROJAS. 2001. Dinámica anual de la interacción colibrí-flor en ecosistemas altoandinos del volcán Galeras, sur de Colombia. Tesis de pregrado. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá. Departamento de Biología.

GUTIÉRREZ, A., S. V. ROJAS-NOSSA & F. G. STILES. 2004. Dinámica anual de la interacción colibrí-flor en ecosistemas altoandinos. Ornitología Neotropical 15: 205-213.

HACKETT, S. 1995. Molecular systematics and zoogeography of flowerpiercers in the Diglossa baritula complex. Auk 112: 156-170.

HAINSWORTH, F. R. & L. L. WOLF 1976. Nectar characteristics and food selection by hummingbirds. Oecologia 25: 101-113.

HEINRICH, B. & P. H. RAVEN. 1972. Energetics and pollination ecology. Science 176: 597 – 602.

HERNÁNDEZ H. M. & V. M. TOLEDO. 1979. The role of nectar robbers and pollinators in the reproduction of Erythrina leptorhiza. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 66: 512-520.

HUTTO, R. 1994. The composition and social organization of mixed-species flocks in a tropical deciduous forest in western Mexico. The Condor 96:105-118.

IRWIN, R. E. & A. K. BRODY. 1999. Nectar-robbing bumblebees reduce the fitness of Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae). Ecology 80:1703-1712.

INOUYE, D. W. 1980. The terminology of floral larceny. Ecology 61: 1251-1253.

INOUYE, D. W. 1983. The ecology of nectar robbing. Págs. 153-174 en: B. Bentley & T. S. Elias (eds.). The biology of nectaries. Columbia University Press, Nueva York.

LARA, C. AND J. F. ORNELAS. 2002. Effects of nectar theft by flower mites on hummingbird behavior and the reproductive success of their host plant, Moussonia deppeana Gesneriaceae). Oikos 96: 470-480.

ISLER, M. L. & P. R. ISLER. 1999. The tanagers. Natural history, distribution and identification. Washington, D. C. Smithsonian Institution Press.

KJONAAS, C. & C. RENGIFO. 2006. Differential effects of avian nectar-robbing on fruit set of two Venezuelan andean cloud forest plants. Biotropica 38: 276–279.

LYON, D. L. & C. CHADEK. 1971. Exploitation of nectar resources by hummingbirds, bees (Bombus), and Diglossa baritula and its role in the evolution of Penstemon kunthii. Condor 73: 246-248.

MALDONADO-COELHO, M. & M. MARINI. 2000. Effects of forest fragment size and successional stage on mixed-species bird flocks in southeastern Brazil. The Condor 102: 585-594.

MALOOF, J. E. & D. W. INOUYE. 2000. Are nectar robbers cheaters or mutualists? Ecology 81: 2651-2661.

MCDADE, L. A. & S. KINSMAN. 1980. The impact of floral parasitism in two neotropical hummingbird-pollinated plant species. Evolution 34: 944-958.

MOYNIHAN, M. 1963. Inter-specific relations between some Andean birds. Ibis 105: 327-339.

MOYNIHAN, M. 1979. Geographic variation in social behaviour and in adaptations to competition among Andean birds. Publ. Nuttall Ornithol. Club No. 18.

MORSE, D. 1970. Ecological aspects of some mixed-species foraging flocks of birds. Ecological Monographs 40: 119-168.

NAOKI, K. 1998. Seasonal change of flower use by the slaty flowerpiercer (Diglossa plumbea). Wilson Bulletin 110: 393-397.

NAVARRO, L. 1999. Pollination ecology and effect of nectar removal in Macleania bullata (Ericaeae). Biotropica 31: 618-625.

NAVARRO, L. 2000. Pollination ecology of Anthyllis vulneraria subsp. vulgaris (Fabaceae): nectar robbers as pollinators. American Journal of Botany 87:980-985.

NAVARRO, L. 2001. Reproductive biology and effect of nectar robbing on fruit production in Macleania bullata (Ericaceae). Plant Ecology 152: 59-65.

ORNELAS, J. F. 1994. Serrate tomia: an adaptation for nectar robbing in hummingbirds? Auk 111:703-710.

PEARSON, O. P. 1954. The daily energy requirements of a wild Anna hummingbird. Condor 56: 317-322.

POWELL, G. V. N. 1979. Structure and dynamics of interspecific flocks in a Neotropical mid-elevation forest. The Auk 96: 375-390.

ROJAS, S. V. 2005. Ecología de la comunidad de pinchaflores (Aves: Diglossa y Diglossopis) en un bosque Altoandino. Tesis de Maestría en Biología. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá.

ROUBIK, D. W. 1982. The ecological impact of nectar-robbing bees and pollinating hummingbirds on a tropical shrub. Ecology 63: 354-360.

SCHONDUBE, J. E. & C. MARTÍNEZ DEL RÍO. 2003a. The flowerpiercers’ hook: an experimental test of an evolutionary trade-off. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 270: 195-198.

SCHONDUBE, J. E. & C. MARTÍNEZ DEL RÍO. 2003b. Concentration-dependent sugar preferences in nectar-feeding birds: mechanisms and consequences. Functional Ecology 17: 445-443.

SCHONDUBE, J. E. & C. MARTÍNEZ DEL RÍO. 2004. Sugar and protein digestion in flowerpiercers and hummingbirds: a comparative test of adaptive convergence. Journal of Comparative Physiology B 174: 263-273.

SKUTCH, A. F. 1954. Life histories of Central American birds: Diglossa plumbea. Pacific Coast Avifauna 31:421-436.

SNOW, D. W. & B. K. SNOW. 1980. Relationships between hummingbirds and flowers in the Andes of Colombia. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History (Zoology) 38: 105-139.

STILES, F. G. 1976. Taste preferences, color preference, and flower choice in hummingbirds. Condor 78:10-26.

STILES, F. G. 1978. Ecological and evolutionary implications of bird pollination. American Zoologist 18: 715-727.

STILES, F. G. 1981. Geographical aspects of bird-flower coevolution, with particular reference to Central America. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 68: 323-351.

STILES, F. G., A. V. AYALA & M. GIRÓN. 1992. Polinización de las flores de Brachyotum (Melastomataceae) por dos especies de Diglossa (Emberizidae). Caldasia 17: 47-54.

SUAREZ, R. K. & C. L. GASS. 2002. Hummingbird foraging and the relation between bioenergetics and behaviour. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 133: 335-343.

TEMELES, E. J., Y. B. LINHART, M. MASONJONES, & H. D. MASONJONES. 2002. The role of flower width in hummingbird bill length-flower length relationships. Biotropica 34: 68–80.

THOMPSON, J. N. 1982. Interaction and coevolution. John Wiley (ed.), Nueva York.

TRAVESET, A. M., M. E. WILLSON, & C. SABAG. 1998. Effects of nectar-robbing birds on fruit set of Fuchsia magellanica in Tierra del Fuego: A disrupted mutualism. Functional Ecology 12: 459-464.

VILLEUMIER, F. 1969. Systematics and evolution in Diglossa (Aves: Coerebidae). A.M.N.H. Novitates No. 2831.

WELLS, D. J. 1993. Ecological correlates of hovering fiight of Hummingbirds. Journal of Experimental Biology 178: 59-70.

WOLF, L. L., F. G. STILES &F. R. HAINSWORTH. 1976. Ecological organization of a tropical highland hummingbird community. Journal of Animal Ecology 32: 349-379.

ZAR, J. H. 1996. Bioestatistical Analysis. 3a Ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-09

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Estrategias de extracción de néctar por pinchaflores (Aves: Diglossa y Diglossopis) y sus efectos sobre la polinización de plantas de los altos Andes: Strategies of nectar extraction by Flowerpiercers (Aves: Diglossa and Diglossopis) and their effects on the pollination of high Andean plants. (2021). Ornitología Colombiana, 5, 21-39. https://doi.org/10.59517/oc.e138