Identificación del sexo en guacamayas neotropicales (Ara spp.) a partir de muestras invasivas y no invasivas
Identificación del sexo en guacamayas neotropicales (Ara spp.) a partir de muestras invasivas y no invasivas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59517/oc.e389Keywords:
CHD, cromosomas sexuales, muestreo no invasivo, identificación del sexo, PsittacidaeAbstract
Aunque la amplificación del gen Helicasa con Cromodominio de Unión a ADN (CHD) ha sido usado para inferir el sexo en guacamayas a partir de sangre y plumas, el uso de muestras no invasivas ha sido poco explorado. Aquí optimizamos un protocolo completo de identificación molecular del sexo en guacamayas (Ara spp.) a partir de muestras de sangre, plumas arrancadas y muestras fecales, utilizando los primers 2550F/2718R para amplificar el gen CHD. Este protocolo es versátil y de utilidad para estudios tanto ex situ como in situ. Logramos identificar exitosamente el sexo de las guacamayas a partir de los tres tipos de tejidos muestreados. Sin embargo, recomendamos el uso de deposiciones fecales frescas para minimizar la manipulación, el estrés y el riesgo de lesión de los animales.
Downloads
References
BOSNJAK, J., M. STEVANOV-PAVLOVIC, M. VUCICEVIC, J. STEVANOVIC, P. SIMEUNOVIC, R. RESANOVIC & Z. STANIMIROVIC. 2013. Feasibility of non-invasive molecular method for sexing of parrots. Pakistan Journal of Zoology 45: 715-720.
DVORÁK, J., J. L. HALVERSON, P. GULICK, K. A. RAUEN, B. ABBOTT, B. J. KELLY & F.T. SHULTZ. 1992. cDNA cloning of a Z- and W-linked gene in Gallinaceous birds. Journal of Heredity 83: 22-25.
ELLEGREN, H. 1996. First gene on the avian W chromosome (CHD) provides a tag for universal sexing of non-ratite birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 263: 1635-1641.
FRIDOLFSSON, A. K. & H. ELLEGREN. 1999. A simple and universal method for molecular sexing of non-ratite birds. Journal of Avian Biology 30: 116-121.
GAGNEUX, P., C. BOESCH & D. S. WOODRUFF. 1997. Microsatellite scoring errors associated with noninvasive genotyping based on nuclear DNA amplified from shed hair. Molecular Ecology 6: 861–868.
GEBHARDT, K. J. & L. P. WAITS. 2008. High error rates for avian molecular sex identification primer sets applied to molted feathers. Journal Field of Ornithology 79: 286-292.
GRIFFITHS, R. W. & B. TIWARI. 1995. Sex of the last wild Spix’s Macaw. Nature 375: 454.
GRIFFITHS, R., S. DAAN & C. DIJKSTRA. 1996. Sex identification in birds using two CHD genes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 263: 1251-1256.
GRIFFITHS, R., M. C. DOUBLE, M. ORR & R. J. DAWSON. 1998. A DNA test to sex most birds. Molecular Ecology 7: 1071-1075.
IUCN 2017. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2017-1. . Downloaded on 20 August 2017.
JENSEN, T., F. M. PERNASETTI & B. DURRANT. 2003. Conditions for rapid sex determination in 47 avian species by PCR of genomic DNA from blood, shell-membrane blood vessels, and feathers. Zoo Biology 22: 561-571.
MATTA, N. E., N. RAMÍREZ, B. C. ZÚÑIGA & V. VERA. 2009. Determinación de sexo en aves mediante herramientas moleculares. Acta Biológica Colombiana 14: 25-38.
MIYAKI, C.Y., R. GRIFFITHS, K. ORR, L. A. NAHUM, S. L. PEREIRA & A. WAJNTAL. 1998. Sex identification of parrots, toucans, and curassows by PCR: Perspectives for wild and captive population studies. Zoo Biology 17: 415-423.
ONG, A.H. & S. VELLAYAN. 2008. An evaluation of CHD-Specific primer sets for sex typing of birds from feathers. Zoo Biology 27: 62-69.
PANASCI, M., W. B. BALLARD, S. BRECK, D. RODRIGUEZ, L. D. DENSMORE, D. B. WESTER & R. J. BAKER. 2011. Evaluation of fecal DNA preservation techniques and effects of sample age and diet on genotyping success. Journal of Wildlife Management 75: 1616-1624.
PIGGOTT, M. P., E. BELLEMAIN, P. TABERLET & A. C. TAYLOR. 2004. A multiplex pre-amplification method that significantly improves microsatellite amplification and error rates for faecal DNA in limiting conditions. Conservation Genetics 5: 417-420.
ROBERTSON, B. C., E. O. MINOT & D. M. LAMBERT. 1999. Molecular sexing of individual kakapo, Strigops habroptilus Aves, from faeces. Molecular Ecology 8: 1349-1350.
ROBERTSON, B. C. & N. J. GEMMELL. 2006. PCR-based sexing in conservation biology: Wrong answers from an accurate methodology? Conservation Genetics 7: 267-271.
SEUTIN, G., B. N. WHITE & P. T. BOAG. 1991. Preservation of avian blood and tissue samples for DNA analyses. Canadian Journal of Zoology 69: 82-90.
TABERLET, P., S. GRIFFIN, B. GOOSSENS, S. QUESTLAU, V. MANCEAU, N. ESCARAVAGE, L. P. WALTS & J. BOUVET. 1996. Reliable genotyping of samples with very low DNA quantities using PCR. Nucleic Acids Research 24: 3189-3194.
TABERLET, P., L. P. WAITS & G. LUIKART. 1999. Noninvasive genetic sampling: look before you leap. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14: 323-327.
VUCICEVIC, M., M. STEVANOV‐PAVLOVIC, J. STEVANOVIC, J. BOSNJAK, B. GAJIC, N. ALEKSIC & Z. STANIMIROVIC. 2013. Sex determination in 58 bird species and evaluation of CHD gene as a universal molecular marker in bird sexing. Zoo Biology 32: 269-276.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.