Morfología y forrajeo para buscar artrópodos por colibríes altoandinos

Morphology and arthropod foraging by high Andean hummingbirds

Authors

  • Alejandro Rico-G Departamento de Biología, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá DC, Colombia y Corporación

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59517/oc.e177

Keywords:

arthropods, ecomorphology, high Andean forest, hummingbirds, foraging

Abstract

Ecomorphological analyses in hummingbirds have focused on mutual evolutionary changes that have shaped bills and corollas, neglecting parallel factors in the evolution of hummingbird morphology and ecology. Here, I highlight the importance of arthropod foraging by hummingbirds in ecological and morphological studies. I examined hunting tactics, prey selection, morphological structures and certain aerodynamic parameters of hummingbirds of a high Andean forest near Bogotá, Colombia, as a first approach to characterizing hummingbird arthropod predation in high mountain environments. For the four most abundant species, I evaluated three complementary sources of data (behavior, morphology and diet) and contrasted my results with three hypotheses derived from a previous study in tropical wet forests. The first of these proposed that curve-billed hummingbirds cannot effectively catch aerial prey and that they glean prey from the substrate, but was not confirmed by my data; neither did I find evidence to support the hypothesis that hummingbirds with medium-length, straight bills prefer flies and wasps, whilst those with long, curved bills prefer spiders. The third hypothesis, that wing aspect ratios in flycatchers are higher than those in hover-gleaners, was corroborated in the present study. One explanation that would reconcile the differences between highland and lowland findings is that individual nectar foraging strategies, territorial vs. traplining (related to wing shape), are more important than curvature or length of the bill in determining arthropod foraging references. The high Andean hummingbird community as a whole consumes more aerial prey than do lowland birds. There exist clear differences in arthropod consumption among species and even between sexes of each species. Furthermore, these differences were significantly related to wing, bill and leg morphology, and aerodynamic indices calculated for such species. I suggest that foraging for arthropods places morphological constraints on the hummingbirds' corporal design and urge future studies to take this into account.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALTSHULER, D. L. 2001. Ecophysiology of hummingbird flight along elevational gradients: an integrated approach. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.

ALTSHULER, D. L. & R. DUDLEY. 2002. The ecological and evolutionary interface of hummingbird flight physiology. Journal of Experimental Biology 205: 2325–2336.

ALTSHULER, D. L., F. G. STILES & R. DUDLEY. 2004. Of hummingbirds and helicopters: hovering costs, competitive ability and foraging strategies. American Naturalist 163:16-25.

ALDRIDGE, G. & D. R. CAMPBELL. 2007. Variation in pollinator preference between two Ipomopsis contact sites that differ in hybridization rate. Evolution 61: 99-110.

ASHMOLE, N. P. 1968. Body size, prey size, and ecological segregation in five sympatric tropical terns (Aves: Laridae). Systematic Zoology 17:292-304.

BAKER, H. G. 1975. Sugar concentrations in nectars from hummingbird flowers. Biotropica 7: 37-41.

BARTHOLOMEW, G. A. & J. R. B. LIGHTON. 1986. Oxygen consumption during hover-feeding in free-ranging anna hummingbirds. Journal of Experimental Biology 123: 191-199.

CHAI, P. 1986. Field observations and feeding experiments on the response of Rufous-tailed Jacamars (Galbula ruficauda) to free-flying butterflies in a tropical rainforest. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 29: 166-189.

CHÁVEZ-RAMÍREZ. F. & S. S. TAM. 1993. Habitat separation and arthropod resource use in three Lesser Antillean Hummingbirds. Condor 95:455-458.

DIPPENAAR-SCHOEMAN, A. S. & R. JOCQUÉ. 1997. African Spiders: An identification manual. Plant Protection Research Institute HandbookNo. 9.

DUDLEY, R. 2002. Mechanisms and implications of animal flight maneuverability. Integrative and Comparative Biology 42:135 -140.

ELLINGTON, C. P. 1984. The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. II. Morphological parameters. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 305:17-40.

FEINSINGER, P. & S. B. CHAPLIN. 1975. On the relationship between wing disc loading and foraging strategy in hummingbirds. The American Naturalist 109:217-224.

FEINSINGER, P. & R. K. COLWELL. 1978. Community organization among neotropical nectarfeeding birds. American Zoologist 18(4): 779-795

FEINSINGER, P., R. K. COLWELL, J. TERBORGH & S. B. CHAPLIN. 1979. Elevation and the morphology, flight energetics, and foraging ecology of tropical hummingbirds. American Naturalist 113:481-497.

FEINSINGER, P., L. A. SWARM & J. A. WOLFE. 1985. Nectar-feeding birds on Trinidad and Tobago: comparisons of diverse and depauperate guilds. Ecological Monographs 55:1-28.

GASS, C. L. & R. D. MONTGOMERIE. 1981. Hummingbird foraging behavior: decision-making and energy regulation. Págs.159-194 en: A. C. Kamil y T. D. Sargent (eds.). Foraging behavior: ecological, ethological, and psychological approaches. Garland STDP Press, Nueva York.

GASS, C. L. & J. S. E. GARRISON. 1999. Energy regulation by traplining hummingbirds. Functional Ecology 13: 483-492.

GONZÁLEZ, R. & N. S. CARREJO. 1992. Introducción al estudio de los Diptera. Colección de Edición Previa, Centro Editorial Universidad del Valle, Serie de Investigaciones.

HAINSWORTH. F. R. 1977. Foraging efficiency and parental care in Colibri coruscans. Condor79:69-75.

HAINSWORTH, F. R. & L. L. WOLF. 1976. Nectar characteristics and food selection by hummingbirds. Oecologia 25:101-113.

IDROBO, C. J. & J. O. CORTÉS-HERRERA. 2006. Colibríes cazando jejenes: El caso de dos especies de Amazilia en los Andes Colombianos. Boletín SAO 16: 40-45.

LARA, C. & J. F. ORNELAS. 1998. Forrajeo de artrópodos por dos colibríes mexicanos en condiciones de aviario. Ornitología Neotropical 9:41–50.

LASIEWSKI, R. C. 1963. Oxygen consumption of torpid, resting, active, and flying hummingbirds. Physiological Zoology 36:122-140.

LEHMANN, E. L. & H. J. M. D'ABRERA. 1998. Nonparametric statistical methods. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

LUCAS, F. A. 1893. The food of hummingbirds. Auk 10:311-315.

MCDADE, L. A. & J. A. WEEKS. 2004. Nectar in hummingbird-pollinated neotropical plants II: interactions with flower visitors. Biotropica 36:216-230.

MCWHORTER, T. J. & M. V. LÓPEZ-CALLEJA. 2000. La integración de la dieta, fisiología, y ecología en aves nectarívoras. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 73:451-460.

MONTGOMERIE, R. D., & C. A. REDSELL. 1980. A nesting hummingbird feeding solely on arthropods. Condor 82:463-464.

NAGY, K. A. 1987. Field metabolic rate and food requirements in mammals and birds. Ecological Monographs 57:111-128.

POULIN, B., G. LEFEBVRE & R. MCNEIL. 1994a. Diets of land birds of northern Venezuela. Condor 96: 354-367.

POULIN, B., G. LEFEBVRE & R. MCNEIL. 1994b. Effect and efficiency of tartar emetic in determining the diet of tropical land birds. Condor 96:98-104.

POULIN, B. & G. LEFEBVRE 1995. Additional information on the use of tartar emetic in determining the diet of tropical birds. Condor 97:897-902.

REMSEN. J. V., F. G. STILES. & P. E. SCOTT. 1986. Frequency of arthropods in stomachs of tropical hummingbirds. Auk 103:436-441.

RICO-G., A. 2004. Fichas de colibríes. En: Gutiérrez-Z., A., Carrillo, E. & S. Rojas. 2004. Guía Ilustrada de los Colibríes de la Reserva Natural Río Ñambí. FPAA, FELCA, ECOTONO. Bogotá, Colombia. http://espanol.geocities.com/ecotono_colombia/html/guiapesquisa.htm#escritura

RICO-G., A. 2005. Relaciones entre morfología y forrajeo de artrópodos en colibríes. Trabajo de grado. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá. http://espanol.geocities.com/ecotono_galerias/pdfs/morfocoli.pdf

RIDGWAY, R. 1891. The Humming Birds. Report of the United States Natural Museum 1890:253-383.

ROJAS-NOSSA, S. 2007. Estrategias de extracción de néctar por pinchaflores (aves: Diglossa y Diglossopis) y sus efectos sobre la polinización de plantas de los altos Andes. Ornitología Colombiana 5:21-39.

SMITH-RAMÍREZ, C., P. MARTÍNEZ, M. NÚÑEZ, C. GONZÁLEZ, & J. J. ARMESTO. 2005. Diversity, flower visitation frequency and generalism of pollinators in temperate rain forest of Chiloé Island, Chile. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 147:399-416.

SNOW, D. W. & B. K. SNOW. 1972. Feeding niches of hummingbirds in a Trinidad valley. Journal of Animal Ecology 41:471-485.

SNOW, D. W. & B. K. SNOW. 1980. Relationships between hummingbirds and flowers in the Andes of Colombia. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Zoology 38:105-139.

STILES, F. G. 1981. Geographical aspects of bird-flower coevolution, with particular reference to Central America. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 68:323-351.

STILES, F. G. 1995. Behavioral, ecological and morphological correlates of foraging for arthropods by the hummingbirds of a tropical wet forest. Condor 97:853-878.

STILES, F. G. 2004. Phylogenetic constraints on ecological and morphological adaptation in hummingbirds (Trochilidae): why are there no hermits in the páramo? Ornitología Neotropical 15 (suppl.):191-198.

STILES, F. G., D. L. ALTSHULER & R. DUDLEY. 2005. Wing morphology and flight behavior of some North American hummingbird species. Auk 122:872-886.

TEMELES, E. J., I. L. PAN, J. L. BRENNAN & J. N. HORWITT. 2000. Evidence for ecological causation of sexual dimorphism in a hummingbird. Science 289: 441-443.

TIEBOUT, H. M. 1991. Daytime energy management by tropical hummingbirds: responses to foraging constraint. Ecology 72:839-851.

TRIPLEHORN, C. A. & N. F. JOHNSON. 2005. Borror and Delong’s introduction to the study of insects. 7th. Edition. Brooks/Cole, Thomson Learning.

WAGNER, H. O. 1946. Food and feeding habits of Mexican hummingbirds. Wilson Bulletin 58:69-82.

WARRICK, D. R., B. W. TOBALSKE & D. R. POWERS. 2005. Aerodynamics of the hovering hummingbird. Nature 435:1094-1096.

WETMORE, A. 1916. Birds of Puerto Rico. United States Department of Agriculture Bulletin 326:1-140.

WOLF, L. L., F. R. HAINSWORTH & F. B. GILL. 1975. Foraging efficiency and time budgets in nectar- feeding birds. Ecology 56: 117-128.

WOLF, L. L., F. G. STILES & F. R. HAINSWORTH. 1976. Ecological organization of a tropical highland hummingbird community. Journal of Animal Ecology 32:349-379.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-09

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Morfología y forrajeo para buscar artrópodos por colibríes altoandinos: Morphology and arthropod foraging by high Andean hummingbirds . (2021). Ornitología Colombiana, 7, 43-58. https://doi.org/10.59517/oc.e177