The social system of Sharpe’s Wren (Cinnycerthia olivascens): fluid group composition in a cooperative breeder

El sistema social del cucarachero de Sharpe: fluidez en la composición de grupos

Authors

  • Gustavo H. Kattan Departamento de Ciencias Naturales y Matemáticas, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali, Calle 18 No. 118-250, Cali, Colombia. 2 Fundación EcoAndina, Carrera 2 A Oeste No. 12-111, Cali, Colombia.
  • Mónica Parada Fundación EcoAndina, Carrera 2 A Oeste No. 12-111, Cali, Colombia.
  • J. William Beltrán Fundación EcoAndina, Carrera 2 A Oeste No. 12-111, Cali, Colombia. 3 Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan PR 00931

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59517/oc.e314

Keywords:

Andes, Colombia, cooperative breeding, helping behavior, social behavior, Troglodytidae

Abstract

Cooperatively breeding birds live in groups that normally originate in the retention of offspring, which delay dispersal and stay in the parental territory, helping to raise close kin. Group transfers usually occur when individuals disperse to obtain re-productive positions. Between 1995 and 2000 we studied the social system of Sharpe's Wren (Cinnycerthia olivascens) in an Andean forest. Wrens lived all the time in groups of up to seven individuals that maintained year-round, all-purpose territories (mean = 7.6 ha) and raised offspring cooperatively. Each group had only one breeding pair and produced 1-3 fledglings. Group composition was highly variable. Birds of all age classes frequently joined and abandoned groups. Birds became helpers when joining new groups. In one case a female breeding vacancy was filled by a bird that had joined the group two and a half years earlier. Four focal groups each had up to 20 different, temporary members in three years of observation, and only the breeding pair was permanent. Seven of eight breeding females and one male (of 35 banded adults) had frontal patches and periocular rings of white feathers, suggesting that this characteristic is related to breeding status (but not necessarily age). Groups maintained three or more roosting nests simultaneously and built new nests continuously. Flea infestations may have been a cause of nest abandonment. Fluidity in group membership suggests that benefits of sociality in this species are not related to indirect fitness, nor to direct benefits that hinge on life-long associations between individuals. Instead, group-living may be related to the need to constantly build new, massive nest structures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BAGLIONE, V., J. M. MARCOS, D. CANESTRARI & J. EKMAN. 2002. Direct fitness benefits of group living in a complex cooperative society of carrion crows, Corvus corone corone. Animal Behaviour 64:887-893.

BRUMFIELD, R. T. & J. V. REMSEN. 1996. Geographic variation and species limits in Cinnycerthia wrens of the Andes. Wilson Bulletin 108:205-227.

COCKBURN, A. 1998. Evolution of helping behavior in cooperatively breeding birds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29:141-177.

DICKINSON, J. L. & B. J. HATCHWELL. 2004. Fitness consequences of helping. Pp. 48-66 in: W.D. Koenig & J.L. Dickinson (eds.). Ecology and evolution of cooperative breeding in birds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

EKMAN, J., J. L. DICKINSON, B. J. HATCHWELL & M. GRIESSER. 2004. Delayed dispersal. Pp. 35-47 en: W.D. Koenig & J.L. Dickinson (eds.). Ecology and evolution of cooperative breeding in birds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

EMLEN, S.T. 1982. The evolution of helping I. An ecological constraints model. American Naturalist 119:29-39.

FREEMAN, B. G. & H. F. GREENEY. 2008. First description of the nest, eggs and cooperative breeding behavior in Sharpe’s Wren (Cinnycerthia olivascens). Ornitología Colombiana 7:88-92.

GOCHFELD, M. 1979. Nest description and plumage variation of the Sepia-brown Wren Cinnycerthia peruana. Bulletin of the British Ornithological Club 99:45-47.

GRAVES, G. R. 1980. Relationship of white facial feathering to age and locality in Peruvian Cinnycerthia peruana. Bulletin of the British Ornithological Club 100:149-150.

HAYDOCK, J., P. G. PARKER & K. N. RABENOLD. 1996. Extra-pair paternity uncommon in the cooperatively breeding bicolored wren. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 38:1-16.

KOENIG, W. D. & J. L. DICKINSON. 2004. Introduction. Pp. 1-14 en: W. D. Koenig & J. L. Dickinson (eds.). Ecology and evolution of cooperative breeding in birds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

KOENIG, W. D. & J. HAYDOCK. 2004. Incest and incest avoidance. Pp. 142-156 en: W. D. Koenig & J. L. Dickinson (eds.). Ecology and evolution of cooperative breeding in birds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

KOENIG, W. D. & F. A. PITELKA. 1981. Ecological factors and kin selection in the evolution of cooperative breeding in birds. Pp. 261-280 en: R. D. Alexander & D. W. Tinkle (eds.). Natural selection and social behavior: recent re-search and new theory. Chiron Press, New York.

KOKKO, H., R. A. JOHNSTONE & T. H. CLUTTON-BROCK. 2001. The evolution of cooperative breeding through group augmentation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 268:187-196.

LONDOÑO, E. 1994. Parque Regional Natural Ucumarí, un vistazo histórico. Pp. 13-24 en: J. O. Rangel (ed.). Ucumarí: un caso típico de la diversidad biótica andina. Corporación Autónoma Regional de Risaralda, Pereira, Colombia.

MAGRATH, R. D. & L. A. WHITTINGHAM. 1997. Subordinate males are more likely to help if unrelated to the breeding female in cooperatively breeding white-browed scrub-wrens. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 41:185-192.

MURCIA, C. 1997. Evaluation of Andean alder as a catalyst for the recovery of tropical cloud forests in Colombia. Forest Ecology and Management 99:163-170.

RABENOLD, K. N. 1990. Campylorhynchus wrens: the ecology of delayed dispersal and cooperation in the Venezuelan savanna. Pp. 157-196 en: P. B. Stacey & W. D. Koenig (eds.). Cooperative breeding in birds: long term studies of ecology and behavior. Cambridge University Press, Cam-bridge, MA, USA.

SHERLEY, G. H. 1990. Co-operative breeding in Riflemen (Acanthisitta chloris): benefits to parents, offspring and helpers. Behaviour 112:1-22.

SHERMAN, P. T. 1995. Social organization of cooperatively polyandrous White-winged Trumpeters (Psophia leucoptera). Auk 112:296-309.

STACEY, P. B. & J. D. LIGON. 1991. The benefits-of-philopatry hypothesis for the evolution of cooperative breeding: variation in territory quality and group size effects. American Naturalist 137:831-846.

YÁBER, M. C. & K. N. RABENOLD. 2002. Effects of sociality on short-distance, female-biased dispersal in tropical wrens. Journal of Animal Ecology 71:1042-1055.

ZACK, S. & K. N. RABENOLD. 1989. Assessment, age and proximity in dispersal contests among cooperative wrens: field experiments. Animal Behavior 38:235-247.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-12

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

The social system of Sharpe’s Wren (Cinnycerthia olivascens): fluid group composition in a cooperative breeder: El sistema social del cucarachero de Sharpe: fluidez en la composición de grupos. (2021). Ornitología Colombiana, 13, 59-68. https://doi.org/10.59517/oc.e314